Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 8 de 8
1.
N Engl J Med ; 390(10): 911-921, 2024 Mar 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393328

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a vasculitis characterized by eosinophilic inflammation. Benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-5α receptor expressed on eosinophils, may be an option for treating EGPA. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, phase 3, randomized, active-controlled noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab as compared with mepolizumab. Adults with relapsing or refractory EGPA who were receiving standard care were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive benralizumab (30 mg) or mepolizumab (300 mg) subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary end point was remission at weeks 36 and 48 (prespecified noninferiority margin, -25 percentage points). Secondary end points included the accrued duration of remission, time to first relapse, oral glucocorticoid use, eosinophil count, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients underwent randomization (70 assigned to each group). The adjusted percentage of patients with remission at weeks 36 and 48 was 59% in the benralizumab group and 56% in the mepolizumab group (difference, 3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13 to 18; P = 0.73 for superiority), showing noninferiority but not superiority of benralizumab to mepolizumab. The accrued duration of remission and the time to first relapse were similar in the two groups. Complete withdrawal of oral glucocorticoids during weeks 48 through 52 was achieved in 41% of the patients who received benralizumab and 26% of those who received mepolizumab. The mean (±SD) blood eosinophil count at baseline was 306.0±225.0 per microliter in the benralizumab group and 384.9±563.6 per microliter in the mepolizumab group, decreasing to 32.4±40.8 and 71.8±54.4 per microliter, respectively, at week 52. Adverse events were reported in 90% of the patients in the benralizumab group and 96% of those in the mepolizumab group; serious adverse events were reported in 6% and 13%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Benralizumab was noninferior to mepolizumab for the induction of remission in patients with relapsing or refractory EGPA. (Funded by AstraZeneca; MANDARA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04157348.).


Anti-Inflammatory Agents , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Churg-Strauss Syndrome , Interleukin-5 Receptor alpha Subunit , Adult , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Churg-Strauss Syndrome/drug therapy , Churg-Strauss Syndrome/immunology , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/immunology , Recurrence , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Remission Induction , Injections, Subcutaneous , Interleukin-5 Receptor alpha Subunit/antagonists & inhibitors , Eosinophils/drug effects , Eosinophils/immunology
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(12): 4431-4440.e1, 2021 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34389506

BACKGROUND: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study (200622) showed that mepolizumab reduces disease flares for patients with uncontrolled FIP1-like-1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor α-negative hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and two or more flares in the previous year. OBJECTIVE: To further characterize the safety, clinical benefit, and pharmacodynamics of mepolizumab. METHODS: Eligible patients from both treatment arms of the double-blind study could enter an open-label extension study (205203; NCT03306043) to receive 4-weekly mepolizumab (300 mg subcutaneously) plus background therapy for 20 weeks. Primary end points were safety-based; other end points included flare rates and changes from baseline in mean daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose and blood eosinophil count. RESULTS: Of 104 patients who completed the double-blind study, 98% (previous placebo, n = 52; previous mepolizumab, n = 50) enrolled in the open-label extension. Overall, 66 of patients reported adverse events (AEs) (65%), 15 reported treatment-related AEs (15%), and nine reported serious AEs (9%). No events were fatal. The annualized flare rate (95% confidence interval) in the previous placebo and previous mepolizumab groups was 0.37 (0.16-0.86) and 0.14 (0.04-0.49) events/y, respectively. Of 72 patients receiving OCS during weeks 0 to 4, 20 (28%; previous placebo, n = 14; previous mepolizumab, n = 6) achieved 50% or greater reductions in mean daily dose during weeks 16 to 20. At week 20, blood eosinophil count was reduced by 89% in patients previously receiving placebo and remained reduced for those previously receiving mepolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Extended mepolizumab treatment was associated with a positive benefit-risk profile. Continued control of disease flares and blood eosinophil counts, plus reductions in OCS use, were observed with mepolizumab in patients with FIP1-like-1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor α-negative HES.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Double-Blind Method , Eosinophils , Humans , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
4.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 140(15): 1137-44, 2015 Jul.
Article De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26230066

New clinical symptoms in the context of rheumatic inflammatory system diseases require the exact knowledge of the anamnestic symptom-characteristic. Fever, skin changes and myalgia are frequent and unspecific symptoms that need a particularly broad-based interdisciplinary approach to identify potential causes. The attending physician can thereby avoid unnecessary, expensive and somewhat stressful tests. This article is intended to give important advice for everyday practice in step-wise diagnostics.


Early Diagnosis , Fever of Unknown Origin/etiology , Myalgia/etiology , Skin Diseases/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Fever of Unknown Origin/diagnosis , Humans , Myalgia/diagnosis , Skin Diseases/diagnosis
6.
Pancreas ; 39(7): 1088-92, 2010 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20357692

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare 2 protocols regarding the initiation of oral nutrition in patients with mild acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We randomized 143 patients to the Lipase directed (LIP) (n = 74) and the self selected PAT (n = 69) group. In the (PAT) group, the patients restarted eating through self-selection. In the LIP group, serum lipase had to normalize before eating. RESULTS: The mean time between admission and oral nutrition was 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1-3) in the PAT group and 3 days (IQR, 2-4) in the LIP group (P < 0.005). Before and after the first meal, the mean Δ visual analogue scale (VAS) was +3.14 mm (±11.5 mm) in the PAT group and +2.85 mm (±16.4) in the LIP group (P = 0.597). The length of hospital stay was 7 days (median; IQR, 5-10.5) in the PAT group and 8 days (median; IQR, 5.75-12) in the LIP group (P = 0.315). CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to demonstrate a difference in postprandial abdominal pain or in the length of hospital stay. Patients with self-selected eating, however, were able to restart eating 1 day earlier, and this difference was found to be significant. Our data suggest that normalization of serum lipase is not obligatory for enteral nutrition in mild acute pancreatitis.


Lipase/blood , Pancreatitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Eating , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pancreatitis/enzymology , Smoking , Time Factors
8.
J Comp Neurol ; 501(4): 647-58, 2007 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17278143

The morphology of retinotectal ganglion cells was investigated by retrograde transport of dextran amines applied into the optic tectum in vitro. Based on criteria such as stratification pattern and size of the dendritic processes, as well as the shape and position of the soma within the dendritic field, three main groups of ganglion cell types with a total of nine different types were identified. The first group included monostratified cells, of which two types (Ma(2) and Mb(5)) may be ON- and OFF-variants, and the third (Mb(6)) had its dendritic field as a narrow band at the inner border of the inner plexiform layer. These three cells had the largest dendritic fields, with areas exceeding 40,000 microm(2). In two additional monostratified cells the dendrites were spread over the entire width of either sublamina a or sublamina b of the inner plexiform layer (Ma, Mb). They were of intermediate size with mean dendritic field areas between 10,000 and 20,000 microm(2). The second group contained two types of bistratified cells (Bb(4/5) and Bb(4,5/5,6)) with two distinct bands of dendritic stratifications in sublamina b. One of them had the smallest dendritic field (below 5,000,mm(2)) of all cell types in the sample. The diffuse cells of the third group had their dendrites across the entire width of the inner plexiform layer. The sample of retinotectal cells investigated in this study included types described previously (Mangrum et al. [2002] Vis Neurosci 19:767-779) but also new types not described previously.


Retina/cytology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology , Superior Colliculi/cytology , Zebrafish/anatomy & histology , Animals , Fluorescent Dyes/metabolism , In Vitro Techniques , Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted , Retina/anatomy & histology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/classification
...